|
"Finally I think we cannot define Human Rights Education
because its creative potential is far greater than we can imagine.
Fifty years is a very short time. Let us meet again in 2048, the
100th anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
Perhaps than we can begin to know what Human Rights Education really
is." Ending her presentation with these words, Nancy Flowers,
director of the Human
Rights Resource Center of the University of Minnesota gave the
international Human Rights Expert Meeting a very challenging beginning.
From May 13th to May 16th, experts, scientists as well as practitioners,
and network members from many different countries came together
to exchange theory and practice of Human Rights Education. Different
approaches to the issue were subject of controversial discussions.
The evening of the first day the conference was open to public
in a panel discussion at the Goethe
Forum in Munich. Felisa Tibbitts from the Human
Rights Education Associates presented three different models
of Human Rights Education in her key note. Whereas the first "values
and awareness model" focuses on transmitting knowledge about
Human Rights the second model, labeled the "accountability
model" targets professionals and Human Rights activists. The
third, the "transformations model" aims to empower the
individual.
Keeping that theoretical background in mind, the four panellists
gave an insight in their country-specific Human Rights Education
programs and implementation problems. In South Africa- as Michelle
Parlevliet from the Center
for Conflict Resolution in Cape Town pointed out- Human Rights
Education mainly means reconciliation in the countrys transformation
process from an Apartheid state to a democratic society.
In the Philippines Human Rights Educators apply a social-psychological
approach facing human rights violations committed during the dictatorship.
Felice Yeban who spoke for the Asian region as a board member of
the Asian Regional
Resource Center for Human Rights Education made also clear that
Human Rights often are considered as a western value system which
is a key problem of Human Rights Education. In her definition Human
Rights Education is cultural work as human rights educators must
pay respect to the specific national cultures and correspondingly
adapt their approaches to their situation. Michela
Cecchini from the Council
of Europe spoke of a pan-European mission to promote Human Rights.
Another panel at the Center
for Applied Policy Research (CAP) the next day of the conference
was devoted to the question of implementing Human Rights Education
programs. The four perspectives presented by Barbara Weber from
the Ludwig Boltzmann
Institute in Vienna, Rui Gomes from the European
Youth Center in Budapest, Jenny Luck from Amnesty
International in London and Patricia Morgado from NOVAMERICA
in Rio de Janeiro/ Brazil had one important point in common: They
reminded the participants that Human Rights Education is a long-term
process and that their is still a greater need to implement HRE
in the formal education sector.
After two days at the CAP in MUNICH, the conference continued as
a retreat of the network members at lake "Ammersee". There,
the network members got to know examples of exercises from their
network colleagues in order to learn from others by experiencing
different exercises. Walter
Fisher and Tanya Odom
presented an exercise from the program "A world of Difference
developed by the Anti-Defamation
League, Patricia Morgado did an activity on the right of expression
and Susanne Ulrich demonstrated an exercise from Tolerance Education
pointing out the intersections with Human Rights Education.
As a suggestion for a network project David
Grant from IFOR presented
an idea of a simulation. This idea could be part of a Human Rights
Summer School which the network members decided to design as a future
work.
By Eva
Rendle
|
 |

Nancy Flowers with Jenny Luck, two women with a lot of experience
in Human Rights Education

The panel at the Goethe Forum moderated b Viola Georgi (CAP)

Patricia Morgado presented an exercise example developed by Novamerica
/ Brazil

Participants (Walter Fisher, Karl-Peter Fritzsche and Felice
Yeban) experience what it means not to have the right to speak

Different fruits, different people: Barbara Weber and Felice
Yeban holding a lemon witha face in their hands during an exercise
of the ADL-Program "A world of difference"

David Grant presenting his idea of a simulation project
|